Skip to content

Conversation

@yp05327
Copy link
Contributor

@yp05327 yp05327 commented Oct 12, 2025

test AI translation

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Oct 12, 2025
@yp05327 yp05327 closed this Oct 12, 2025
@yp05327 yp05327 reopened this Oct 12, 2025
@yp05327 yp05327 force-pushed the ai-generate-readme branch 3 times, most recently from 056b638 to a20c099 Compare October 12, 2025 07:25
@yp05327 yp05327 force-pushed the ai-generate-readme branch from 4020632 to 992e7f4 Compare October 12, 2025 07:49
@yp05327 yp05327 closed this Oct 12, 2025
@denyskon
Copy link
Member

Could we, please, just not do it?

Every single peace of technical docs using AI translation that I've experienced has been confusing crap. AI just doesn't get context and technical terminology.

@yp05327
Copy link
Contributor Author

yp05327 commented Oct 12, 2025

First of all, this is just a test.
Regarding your point — you’re referring to the technical documentation, not the README.
There are currently no plans to use AI translation for the documentation, since as you mentioned, the quality isn’t good enough.
This applies only to the README, which serves mainly as an introduction and doesn’t require much contextual understanding or deal with many technical terms.

@yp05327
Copy link
Contributor Author

yp05327 commented Oct 12, 2025

There's a security policy from GitHub, so I can not run the CI directly in this PR.
You can check the local run result in 51eac57
I would say that this is pritty good. Better than the existing zh-cn translation and the jp ver. in #35634

@denyskon
Copy link
Member

I question the need of multilingual readmes in general 🫣

@wxiaoguang
Copy link
Contributor

I question the need of multilingual readmes in general 🫣

I also question .... maybe you can also comment on

@wxiaoguang
Copy link
Contributor

I would say that this is pritty good.

yes, for document work, AI does better than 99.9% people.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. modifies/docs modifies/internal

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants